CASE LAW ON DOCTRINE OF ULTRA VIRES NO FURTHER A MYSTERY

case law on doctrine of ultra vires No Further a Mystery

case law on doctrine of ultra vires No Further a Mystery

Blog Article

33 . Const. P. 114/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Zoya and another V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi Additionally, the main objectives of your police is always to apprehend offenders, look into crimes, and prosecute them before the Courts, also to prevent the commission of crime, and previously mentioned all, make sure regulation and order to protect citizens' lives and property. The law enjoins the police being scrupulously fair into the offender as well as Magistracy is to ensure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Deviations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the legislation and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court and also from other Courts, Nonetheless they have didn't have any corrective effect on it.

Article 199 in the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other satisfactory remedy is provided by law." It is actually properly-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust available remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether Those people remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more

If the DIGP finds evidence of the cognizable offense by possibly party, he shall direct the relevant SHO to record statements and move forward according towards the law. This petition stands disposed of in the above terms. Read more

Sign up for E-mail Notification of recent opinions The cases listed down below have experienced opinions filed for them within the final fourteen times. The following information is obtainable for Each individual case: Information Sheet - Click a case number to view case details, such as signing JusticesJudges and participating attorneys.

149 . Const. P. 6193/2016 (D.B.) Syed Musawar Shah V/S M.D CSD and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the instant Petition under Article 199 from the Constitution based about the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued towards the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement in the FIR lodged by FIA and from the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.

Even though there is not any prohibition against referring to case legislation from a state other than the state in which the case is being read, it holds tiny sway. Still, if there is not any precedent inside the home state, relevant case regulation from another state might be viewed as from the court.

Apart from the rules of procedure for precedent, the weight supplied to any reported judgment may possibly count on the reputation of both the reporter and the judges.[7]

In federal or multi-jurisdictional regulation systems there might exist conflicts between the different decreased appellate courts. Sometimes these differences will not be resolved, and it may be necessary to distinguish how the regulation is applied in one district, province, division or appellate department.

, which is Latin for “stand by decided matters.” This means that a court will be bound to rule in accordance with a previously made ruling about the same type of case.

This Court may possibly interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer in a manner inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the mode of inquiry or where the summary or finding arrived at by the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. In case the conclusion or finding is for instance no reasonable person would have ever arrived at, the Court could interfere with the summary or maybe the finding and mildew the relief to really make it appropriate towards the facts of each case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority may be the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-enjoy the evidence or even the nature of punishment. To the aforesaid proposition, we are fortified by the decision of your Supreme Court within the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Source: Order: Downloads 337 Order Date: 24-JAN-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp

Federalism also plays a major role in determining the authority of case law in a very particular court. Indeed, Each individual circuit has its personal list of binding case law. Due to this fact, a judgment rendered within the Ninth Circuit will not be binding during the Second check here Circuit but will have persuasive authority.

Statutory laws are These created by legislative bodies, including Congress at both the federal and state levels. While this form of law strives to form our society, providing rules and guidelines, it would be difficult for just about any legislative body to anticipate all situations and legal issues.

We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy in the information contained on this site, or even the information linked to within the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can create inaccuracies. You should read the full case before counting on it for legal research purposes.

Free database for searching federal court dockets and documents pulled from PACER. Coverage will not be detailed, but this is a superb starting point. See Background section at bottom of RECAP website for more information.

Report this page